Apple sued by women who say AirTag lets stalkers track victims

TechnologyApple sued by women who say AirTag lets stalkers...


Apple has been sued by two women who said its AirTag devices have made it easier for their former partners and other stalkers to track down victims.

In a proposed class action filed on Monday in San Francisco federal court, the women said Apple has been unable to protect people from unwanted trafficking through AirTag since launching what it called the “stalker proof” device in April 2021.

Starting at $29, AirTags are 1-1/4 inches in diameter, and intended to be slipped into or attached to keys, wallets, backpacks and other items so people can find them when they are lost.

But privacy experts and law enforcement have said some people use Airtags for criminal or malicious purposes.

The plaintiffs called AirTag “the weapon of choice of stalkers and abusers,” and said it has been linked to murders this year of women from Akron, Ohio, and Indianapolis.

The women said Apple has been unable to protect people from unwanted trafficking through AirTag since launching what it called the “stalker proof” device in April 2021.
Christopher Sadowski

Monday’s lawsuit seeks unspecified damages for US owners of iOS or Android-based devices who were tracked by AirTag or are “at risk” of being stalked because of Apple’s alleged negligence.

Apple did not immediately respond on Tuesday to requests for comment.

The Cupertino, Calif.-based company has acknowledged that “bad actors” have tried misusing Airtags.

In February, Apple announced planned upgrades to make it easier to find the devices, and warn users faster that unknown AirTags might be “traveling with them.”

Apple logo
has acknowledged that “bad actors” have tried misusing Airtags.
REUTERS

One plaintiff in Monday’s lawsuit, Lauren Hughes, said her former boyfriend learned where she had moved to avoid him after placing an AirTag in her car’s wheel well.

She said he later posted a photo online of a taco truck from her new neighborhood, and included a winking emoji with the hashtag “#airt2.0.”

The other plaintiff, Jane Doe, said her estranged husband tracked her after putting an AirTag in their child’s backpack.

The case is Hughes et al v. Apple Inc., US District Court, Northern District of California, No. 22-07668.



Learn more

Latest news

Fixing Water Systems In East Africa Before Problems Get Out Of Hand

When we last met Sarah Evans and Kathryn Bergmann, they were in the early days of running their...

XRP Price Analysis for January 31

Disclaimer: The opinion expressed here is not investment advice – it is provided for informational purposes only. It...

Pfizer forecasts big drop in revenue after record $100M COVID-led haul

Pfizer on Tuesday forecast a bigger-than-expected drop in sales of its COVID-19 vaccine and treatment for 2023, intensifying investor...

Nine Mistakes New Entrepreneurs Often Make With Marketing

One of the first steps entrepreneurs should take after starting their business is getting word out to the...

Pioneering NFT ETF Shutting Down as Enthusiasm Subsides

Alex Dovbnya A ground zero NFT exchange-traded fund is closing its doors for investors due to the lack of...

Must read

Fixing Water Systems In East Africa Before Problems Get Out Of Hand

When we last met Sarah Evans and Kathryn...

XRP Price Analysis for January 31

Disclaimer: The opinion expressed here is not investment...

Pfizer forecasts big drop in revenue after record $100M COVID-led haul

Pfizer on Tuesday forecast a bigger-than-expected drop in sales...

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you